Scenario: The teachers
at your school have been told that evidence of student learning must be
archived. The teachers have turned to you to design a simple process that all
teachers and students can follow. Your school has access to a variety of Web
2.0 digital tools. Items that you must consider:
• What tool will
be used?
• How will the
artifacts be organized?
• How much time
will be required of teachers?
You realize that you must introduce your solution to teachers without
overwhelming them. Describe your process and considerations in a handout
to teachers. The purpose of the memo is to introduce the teachers to the idea,
not to provide training.
The
tool that I would recommend to organize and manage Digital Portfolios for my
school district is Weebly. Weebly is a website and blog Web 2.0 tool that
allows teachers to create, manage and control students websites and blogs.
Students can use Weebly’s webpage and blogging features to store the various
requirements of a digital portfolio. When creating a Digital Portfolio for my
school district, an easy 2.0 web tool that would allow my students to create,
add and manage artifacts at an early age is a critical feature. Digital
Portfolios that are created will be based on a growth digital portfolio model.
The focus of the portfolio is demonstrating how student’s skills and knowledge
have grown and developed from Kindergarten through 8th grade.
Students
can use the Web Page feature of Weebly to store and organize artifacts. For my
school district the best way to organize student’s artifacts and tasks would be
by grade level. Each grade level could have a separate web page, allowing all
grade level artifacts to be organized together. All webpages, blogs and artifacts
can be made available and unavailable for viewing, editing, and commenting at
teacher discretion. Students and teachers also have the availability to send
and receive surveys and forms. These assessments will provide opportunities for
teachers and technology integrators to evaluate students on the International
Society for Technology in Education for Students standards. Common Core and
other critical tasks could also be assessed and stored in each student’s
Digital Portfolio.
The
reflection component of the Digital Portfolio can be done in the Blog feature,
a separate Digital Portfolio reflection web page, or on the grade level web page
with the artifact(s). Teachers and
students have the ability to create a reflection that is age appropriate at the
student’s grade level. During beginner elementary years, students may use voice
recording equipment and software to record Digital Portfolio reflections. By 8th
grade students should be capable of adding, maintaining, submitting and
evaluating artifacts within their Digital Portfolio with little to limited
assistance from teachers and peers.
A
fair amount of classroom and preparation time would be spent incorporating
Digital Portfolios into the primary classroom of each student. Currently
portfolios are created only within the computer class. A major advantage to
classroom teacher is that students already have portfolios that are created,
marinated and prepared by someone other than the classroom teacher. This allows
the classroom teacher to focus on helping the students add and maintain to
their portfolio, without requiring them to set up the initial portfolio. By
having all portfolios created within the computer lab, this allows the school
district to ensure all portfolios are created the same way, with the same
formats and requirements.
Requiring
classroom teachers to create lesson plans and projects that incorporate
technology would drastically change and affect numerous teachers’ lesson plans
and curriculum. Many teachers within my building do not incorporate technology
in their classroom, or only use technology very limited and sporadically. These
teachers would need to work with the technology integrator to create lesson
plans and projects that incorporate technology to fulfill the teacher’s
standards and expectations, the State Education Standards and the International
Society for Technology in Education standards.
Teachers
that already use technology in their classroom would be better prepared and
more comfortable with the Digital Portfolio transition. All teachers would have
to create rubrics and evaluations that include the International Society for
Technology in Education. Additional time would also need to be spent outside of
the classroom evaluating Digital Portfolio artifacts and critical tasks.
Overall,
the additional time that would be spent on Digital Portfolios would depend upon
the requirements and expectations of the student’s portfolios. At the current
time, there is no expectation for classroom teachers to contribute to the
Digital Portfolio. The principal, technology committee and the technology
teacher would have to work with teachers to provide opportunities for them to
learn more about Digital Portfolios, and how to create lesson plans and
requirements that demonstrate and show technology usage and competency.
Providing teachers with resources, trainings, networks and support will allow
teachers to feel more comfortable approaching and engaging in the creation of
student’s Digital Portfolios. Each teacher will have a different comfort level
with Digital Portfolios; therefore, all teachers will learn and embrace the
challenge differently and in a different amount of time.
No comments:
Post a Comment